row1a.gif (269 bytes) row1bkgd.gif (976 bytes)
Braverman & Hymowitz: Attorneys At Law, Florida
About Braverman and HymowitzBraverman and Hymowitz: AttorneysBraverman and Hymowitz: Practice AreasBraverman and Hymowitz: Articles and PublicationsBraverman and Hymowitz: Free eNewsletterBraverman and Hymowitz: FAQsBraverman and Hymowitz: Useful LinksBraverman and Hymowitz: Contact InformationBraverman and Hymowitz: Home
bkgdside.gif (91 bytes)

Family and Marital Law Related
Frequently Asked Questions


"I just moved to Florida and wish to file for a divorce. Does Florida divorce law have a residency requirement?"

The state of Florida does have a residency requirement. It is necessary for a person to reside in the state of Florida at least six (6) months prior to filing a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage.
(top)

"What are the grounds necessary to file a divorce in the state of Florida?"

The state of Florida is a no-fault state, and grounds that are necessary in many states are not necessary in Florida. In Florida, the only ground which needs to be proven is that the marriage is irretrievably broken, or the mental incapacity of one of the parties. However, if a party is mentally incapacitated, a dissolution shall not be allowed unless the party alleged to be incapacitated has been adjudged incapacitated according to the provisions of Florida Statute 744.331 for a proceeding period of at least three years.
(top)

"Is it possible for a male to get an award of spousal support?"
Yes. In the state of Florida, a male or a female can be awarded spousal support depending on certain criteria as set forth in the Florida Statutes. In determining a proper award of spousal support, the court is to consider the following factors:

  • The standard of living established during the marriage;
  • The duration of the marriage;
  • The age, and physical and emotional condition, of each party;
  • The financial resources of each party;
  • The non-marital and marital assets and liabilities distributed to each;
  • When applicable, the time necessary for either party to acquire sufficient education or training to enable each party to find appropriate employment;
  • The contribution of each party to the marriage, including services rendered in homemaking, child care, education, and career-building of the other party;
  • All sources of income available to either party.

The court may consider any other factor necessary to do equity and justice between the parties.

(top)

"Do the courts in Florida have the power to have the children of the marriage live with both of the parties 50% of the time after a divorce?"

Yes. Under special circumstances, a court may order rotating child custody if the court finds that it will be in the best interest of the children.

(top)

"While the court is determining which parent a child will reside with (or child custody), does the sex of the party, the sex of the child, or the age of the child factor into the decision?"

Under Florida divorce law, the court is mandated to order that parental responsibility for a minor child be shared by both parties unless the court finds that shared parental responsibility would be a detriment to the child. It is the public policy in the state of Florida to ensure that a minor child has frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents separate or the marriage is dissolved and to encourage both parents to share in the rights and responsibilities and joys of child-rearing. After considering all relevant factors, the father of a child is to be given the same consideration as the mother in determining the primary residence of the child, irrespective of the age or sex of the child.

For purposes of shared parental responsibility and primary interest, the best interests of the child shall include an evaluation of all factors affecting the welfare and interests of the child, including, but not limited to, the following:

  • The parent who is more likely to allow the child frequent and continuing contact with the non-residential parent;
  • The love, affection, and other emotional ties existing between the parents and the child;
  • The capacity and disposition of the parent to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care or other remedial care recognized and permitted under the laws of the state of Florida in lieu of medical care and other material needs;
  • The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity;
  • The permanency, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed custodial home;
  • The moral fitness of the parent;
  • The mental and physical health of the parent;
  • The home, school, and community record of the child;
  • The reasonable preference of the child if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference.
  • The willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent/child relationship between the child and the other parent;
  • Evidence that any party has knowingly provided false information to the court regarding a domestic violence proceeding pursuant to Florida Statute 741.30;
  • Evidence of domestic violence or child abuse;
  • Any other fact considered by the court to be relevant.
(top)

"Must a house be sold if the husband and wife bought the house together during the marriage and the minor child or children have been living in the home upon a divorce being granted?"

Under Florida divorce law, the court is to consider the desirability of retaining the marital home as a residence for a dependent child of the marriage: when it would be equitable to do so and in the best interest of the child; and when it is financially feasible for the parties to maintain the residence until the child is emancipated.

(top)

"My spouse cheated on me. If I file for 'fault divorce,' am I likely to get more in terms of spousal support and property?"

Florida eliminated "fault" as grounds for a divorce long ago. Presently, all that is required to obtain a dissolution of marriage in Florida is one party to the marriage to reside in Florida for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the petition, and one party alleging that either the marriage is irretrievably broken or that one party is mentally incapacitated. Notwithstanding, the trial court under appropriate circumstances may consider "fault" when alimony and the division of marital assets and liabilities are issues in the case.

The Florida Alimony statute states, "The court may consider the adultery of either spouse and the circumstances thereof in determining the amount of alimony, if any, to be awarded." However, the case law interpreting the alimony statute makes it very clear that the primary criteria to be used by the trial court when considering a spouse's request for alimony is the requesting spouse's need for alimony and the other spouse's ability to pay it. As such, despite the aforementioned statutory provision, trial courts generally will not consider evidence of adultery relevant in making an alimony award, unless the adultery caused a depletion of family resources or had some other financial effect detrimental to the innocent spouse.

Florida's higher courts have similarly ruled that the trial court should apply a similar standard for considering adultery when determining how to divide the parties' property (equitable distribution). Typically, marital misconduct, including adultery, cannot serve as a valid reason to award a greater share of the marital assets to the innocent spouse, unless the misconduct resulted in the dissipation of marital assets. Accordingly, as with alimony, adultery usually does not justify an unequal award of marital assets absent a financial effect to the marital estate resulting from the adultery. Most often, the financial effects on the marital estate arise where a spouse buys his or her paramour lavish gifts, or spends large sums of money for travel or other entertainment with his or her paramour. In such circumstances, the court will try to protect the innocent spouse from having to pay for the adulterous spouse's improper use of the marital funds and will generally "reimburse" the innocent spouse from the wrongdoing spouse's share of the marital estate.

In short, adultery alone will not normally be a persuasive factor in the trial court's consideration of alimony or equitable distribution, unless it can be demonstrated that the adultery resulted in a financial detriment to the innocent spouse's interest in the marital estate.
(top)

| About Us | Attorneys | Practice Areas | Articles | eNewsletter | FAQs | Useful Links | Contact Us | Home |

Copyright ©2008: Braverman & Hymowitz.  All rights reserved.
Designed and maintained by: SameDayWebSite.com